![u he diva oversampling u he diva oversampling](https://x3i4u3r4.stackpathcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/FabFilter-Pro-MB-Cov-IMG001.jpg)
If you take an analog synth with 6 voices, each with two oscillators then you have 12 oscillators. That's what I tried in the very beginning with my Wavestation and that's what I'm still trying to achieve now with my current equipment. If I would happen to own only a Nord right now for whatever reason, I'd try to get the most out of it for my purposes. And to come back to the initial question: I honestly don't even care. What I like in particular about the analog character would be its imperfections, but also "fatness" or whatever attribute we've all been reading about for the past decades. I still prefer analog filters to most emulations, yes. So for me it has never been a question of analog vs. All of that would only lead me to wasting a lot of time. I don't want 1000 delays to choose from, I don't want 100 different filter modes, and I certainly don't need 25 different versions of a Moog synth - be it emulated or hardware. My rule is only to use just one thing of each. I still use plug-ins, but only if they do something that my current hardware doesn't do, like for example granular synthesis or simple sample playback.
![u he diva oversampling u he diva oversampling](https://u-he.com/products/diva/assets/images/uhe-diva-screenshot-synthlayout2-1000x558.jpg)
![u he diva oversampling u he diva oversampling](https://u-he.com/products/diva/assets/images/uhe-diva-screenshot-crop-osc-dualvco-500x252.jpg)
#U he diva oversampling pro#
As you know, I own a Pro 2 as well, and I'm also an avid Push 2 user, which I like because it takes the concept of a studio just being an instrument amongst others to a compelling level. But not exclusively because they're analog. And it's precisely there, where the analog instruments came in for me. I was still able to produce music, nothing totally blocked me, but it made more sense to me to cut down on the actual equipment I use. It has neither been particular compelling for me to edit sounds with a mouse, nor physically pleasing to interact with a display only.
![u he diva oversampling u he diva oversampling](https://u-he.com/products/soundsets/assets/images/uhe-diva-soundsets-header-1100x290.jpg)
I can also relate to why Dave moved back to hardware, because I sit at the computer all day already for the work I'm doing. When I settled with Native Instruments' Komplete and numerous more plug-ins, I felt like I had all the tools I need, but I also recognized that I became less of a tweaker, maybe a preset adjuster in most cases. Simply put: I need limits to work around, since I approach the act of creation as a problem solving case in the first place. I'm enough of a dialectic thinker that I would say if everything is suddenly possible, nothing ends up being possible anymore. But: With the abundance of instruments you're offered these days it's hard to draw lines. No, I would never want to miss a laptop-based studio ever. Not because i think it was better to record to tape or anything like that. Although I was first and foremost attacted by the early analog renaissance and subsequently units like the Monotron for example, my ultimate goal was to get out of the box that is the computer. See, the reasons why I use analog has a lot to do with me moving back to hardware, and that was a step that wasn't entirely influenced by the analog-digital-dichotomy. Even then, the question is not easy to answer. But I take the Nord reference as a representative example for VAs and any emulative plug-in respectively. I've never owned a Nord and feel like I had to in order to give a fair answer. My initial answer would be: I don't know. That's certainly an intersting question worth asking.